Agreeing to Valuation Dates

I’m Jennifer Moore of Moore Family Law in Plymouth, Minnesota. Our legal practice encompasses trusts, estate law and probate as well as family law. But the holidays present a special challenge for families that are going through a divorce, a process which often brings with it disputes over emotional hurts, property, child support and alimony, custody and visitation and Spousal Support Lawyer MN.

You and your spouse have been through counseling and some tough times, and you’ve come to realize that it’s time to separate, or even, divorce.  During this emotionally taxing time, you also have to start thinking about dividing your physical property.

The property you have to consider dividing includes just about everything, including the kitchen sink.  It includes your home, cabin, cars, possibly a boat and a pair of jet skiis.  The property represents a lot of investment of time and money in physical objects.  Further, there are intangible assets that are literally investments, including bank accounts, retirement assets, and investment assets.

Before the recent downturn in the economy, it was relatively simple to determine the value of individual property.  Your home could be appraised, and you could refinance the mortgage fairly easily to buy out one spouse.  You could look up the Kelley Blue Book value of vehicles.  You could talk to your Human Resources director to get a current valuation of your 401(k).

That’s not necessarily the case anymore. It has gotten more difficult to value property that has significantly lost value over recent time.  Setting the valuation date becomes an issue to be fought over, as each of you want a more beneficial valuation date to maximize your share of the property.

Minnesota statute sets the valuation date of property to be divided in the divorce “as of the day of the initially scheduled prehearing settlement conference.”  Minn. Stat. § 518.58, subd. 1.  It is possible, however, to modify that valuation date if “agreed upon by the parties.”  Id.  Further, the court may make “specific findings that another date of valuation is fair and equitable.”  Id.

Ideally, you and your spouse should agree on a date to determine the values of all your property.  This may include talking to a real estate agent to discuss the value of your home, an accountant to determine the value of your physical assets, and a financial advisor to determine the best time to value your intangible assets.  The more you and your spouse can cooperate on this one issue as you move through the process of Divorce Lawyer Minnesota, the more you can save in attorneys’ fees down the road. 

About Author

Jennifer graduated from the University of Minnesota cum laude with a bachelor’s degree in speech communications. In 2006, Jennifer achieved her life’s dream; owning her own Family Law Attorney Minnesota practice. She practices every day as Divorce lawyers Minnesota with the intention of representing her clients’ future.

Marriage Equality and Divorce

DIVORCE AND MARRIAGE

Not too many people come to my office seeking a divorce, because they are unhappy with the division of labor in their marriages, but frequently, when I dig a little deeper into the case, I do find support for the position that women would rather be divorced and self-reliant than housewives.   Men, on the other hand, would prefer to have a housewife than be divorced.

In this article in Slate, new research is discussed that confirms my gut feeling that if a woman cannot have an egalitarian role in the

Marriage, she will end the marriage in favor of self- reliance.

DIVORCE AND HUSBANDS

When husbands come to Divorce lawyer Minnesota with questions about spousal maintenance, often they are outraged that they would have to pay a monthly sum for a woman who could get a job. The answer from the Courts is, “You married this problem.”   In other words, the fact that your spouse has been unemployed for a significant period of time may be the product of your preferences during your marriage.

Although I can argue to the Courts that the choice of the spouse not to work was not about my client’s choice, but rather some unilateral decision by the other spouse, it is more difficult to explain why my client didn’t file for divorce before the other spouse’s jobless status became an artifact of the marriage.

DIVORCE AND EQUALITY

So, it does not serve anyone’s best interests to allow the marriage to become less than egalitarian.

About Author

Jennifer graduated from the University of Minnesota cum laude with a bachelor’s degree in speech communications. In 2006, Jennifer achieved her life’s dream; owning her own Family Law attorney Minnesota Practices. She practices every day as Divorce Attorney Minnesota with the intention of representing her clients’ future.